United Kingdom
Carriers, Lloyd’s and London Market, MGAs under delegated authority.
We scope against
- PRA SS1/23 model risk
- FCA Consumer Duty
- UK GDPR
Explainable AI for risk scoring, submission processing and board reporting.
Markets
Each region has its own regulators, distribution models and data rules. We scope every pilot against the requirements that matter in your market.
Carriers, Lloyd’s and London Market, MGAs under delegated authority.
We scope against
Carriers, MGAs and program business across commercial and specialty lines.
We scope against
GCC carriers, takaful operators and regional reinsurers.
We scope against
Carriers, MGAs and reinsurers across APAC hubs including Singapore and Hong Kong.
We scope against
Listed topics are reviewed with your compliance and technology teams during scoping; they are not statements of regulatory approval.
The problem
Underwriting relies on manual review, incomplete data, and subjective judgment. A single commercial policy can take days, and inaccurate risk pricing erodes combined ratios.
Policy administration, reinsurance, and compliance sit in disconnected systems, creating data silos, audit gaps, and slow customer service.
Boards and C-suites receive static reports days after events occur. Strategic decisions are made on stale, incomplete intelligence they cannot interrogate.
The platform
Start with a focused use case. Use RiskEngine on its own or within InsurEdge, and connect your chosen products across the insurance value chain.
Illustrative flow; exact stages depend on your products and workflow.
Bring together an application and its supporting documents.
Prepare submission information for review and risk assessment.
RiskEngine provides an explainable risk and pricing recommendation.
The underwriter reviews the recommendation and decides next steps.
ML models that score risk and recommend pricing, available within InsurEdge or as a standalone module.
Explore RiskEngine
One AI workspace for intake, underwriting and policy workflows around your existing core systems.
Explore InsurEdge
Live dashboards, forecasts, and AI briefings for boards and C-suites.
Explore ExecBrief
RiskEnginePart of the InsurEdge workbench; also available separately
Insurance-focused machine learning for risk assessment and pricing, with the reasoning behind every recommendation.
For Underwriting teams, pricing and actuarial leads
~5 minPer file (about 303 seconds), internal measurement
Request a RiskEngine demo
InsurEdgeUnderwriting workspace
Submission intake, underwriting and policy workflows in one place, working alongside your existing core systems.
For Underwriting operations, policy administration, compliance
4 to 5 minPer file, internal measurement
Request an InsurEdge demo
ExecBriefExecutive intelligence
Executive views, forecasts and AI briefings that sit alongside your existing BI and finance reporting.
For Boards, C-suites, finance and strategy teams
Pilot KPIBoard-pack preparation time against your current cycle
Request an ExecBrief demoMeasurable value
Processing time, accuracy and cost are measured during the pilot against your current process, using agreed definitions rather than vendor estimates. Each pilot closes with a scorecard your finance, underwriting and risk owners can sign off.
Scroll to view the full table
| Product | What we measure | How it is measured | P&L line |
|---|---|---|---|
| RiskEngine | Time to quote | Submission received to priced recommendation, per case | Premium growth, expense ratio |
| Risk-model accuracy | Discrimination (Gini/AUC) and calibration on hold-out and live business; underwriter override rate | Loss ratio | |
| Fraud and anomaly precision | Share of flagged cases confirmed on review; missed cases found later | Loss ratio | |
| InsurEdge | Processing time per submission | Intake to underwriting-ready, from workflow timestamps | Expense ratio |
| Extraction accuracy | Field-level accuracy versus underwriter-validated values | Expense ratio, data quality | |
| Straight-through and rework rate | Cases needing no manual touch; cases returned for missing or incorrect data | Expense ratio, capacity | |
| ExecBrief | Reporting cycle time | Hours to produce a board or management pack, before and after | Expense ratio |
| Forecast accuracy | Forecast error (MAPE) against actuals for premium and loss ratio | Planning, capital allocation |
Processing times are Hyperion internal measurements. Accuracy, cost and P&L figures come only from pilots measured against your baseline.
More consistent risk selection, pricing adequacy by segment and earlier fraud signals reduce claims cost per pound, dollar or dirham of premium written.
Less manual keying, rework and report assembly lowers acquisition and administration cost per policy.
Faster, more consistent quotes improve broker responsiveness and let the same underwriting team handle more submissions.
Explainable decisions, audit trails and timely forecasts support model-risk oversight, regulatory review and earlier capital decisions.
Enter your own figures and assumptions. This is illustrative, not a forecast or guarantee; released-hour value represents capacity, not guaranteed cash savings.
Claims impact = annual GWP × assumed loss-ratio improvement (points ÷ 100). Released-hour value = annual submissions × minutes × assumed reduction (%) ÷ 100 ÷ 60 × hourly cost. It is not a guaranteed cash saving; excludes implementation fees, premium growth and capital effects.
How we work
Start with one workflow. Agree the baseline, success measures, data handling and decision owners before any pilot begins.
Select a workflow, such as submission triage, risk scoring or board reporting. Document the current process and agree measurable acceptance criteria.
Confirm jurisdiction, data access, integration boundaries and review controls. Then evaluate the scoped use case with your team.
Review results against the agreed criteria. Decide whether to stop, refine the use case or plan a wider deployment.
Security & governance
Every deployment is reviewed against your product, jurisdiction and operating model, with your risk, compliance and technology teams involved from day one.
Agree how recommendations are reviewed, challenged and documented by your underwriting and governance teams.
Review data categories, access, retention, transfer and hosting requirements before sharing operational or policyholder data.
Document which core, policy, CRM and reporting systems are in scope, and which remain systems of record.
Map relevant local obligations and control evidence with your compliance, legal and technology teams for the intended deployment.
Architecture and data-flow overview, hosting and data-handling options, model documentation approach and the current control evidence available for your review.
Not by default. InsurEdge supports intake, underwriting and policy workflows. Systems, responsibilities and integration boundaries are agreed during discovery; a core-system replacement is not assumed.
We scope one workflow, document the current process and agree measurable acceptance criteria. Jurisdiction, data handling, system access and review controls are confirmed before evaluation. Any decision to expand is based on results against the agreed criteria.
Hyperion.ai is focused on insurance teams in the UK, US, Middle East and Asia. We scope jurisdiction, local workflows, hosting and control requirements with each organisation; deployment suitability is confirmed for the specific use case.
Yes. RiskEngine is part of the InsurEdge workbench and can also be evaluated on its own as a standalone module. You can start with one product or module against a focused use case. Connections to other products and systems are scoped around your requirements.
Hosting and data-residency requirements depend on the deployment and jurisdiction. We confirm available options and review the requirements with your team before a pilot; contact us for current deployment details.
RiskEngine is designed to provide explainable risk and pricing recommendations for underwriter review. The appropriate human review, controls and audit requirements are scoped for the intended use.
ExecBrief is positioned to complement existing reporting and BI: it focuses on executive views, forecasts and briefings. Data sources and integration boundaries are agreed during discovery.
We don’t publish certification claims on this website. Request our security & governance pack for the current control evidence, hosting options and data-handling details available for your evaluation.
Company
Hyperion.ai combines insurance domain expertise with machine learning to support insurers operating in the UK, US, Middle East and Asia. The operating entity is Sumyati Astro Tech LLP.
We welcome conversations with insurance teams.
Contact
Tell us what interests you, from product demos and pilots to security details or a P&L walkthrough. We’ll follow up to discuss your requirements.