Insurance file processing in minutes.

Explainable AI for risk scoring, submission processing and board reporting.

  • ~5 min processing time
  • Explainable by design
  • UK, US, Middle East & Asia
Built for
  • Insurance carriers
  • MGAs
  • Reinsurers
  • Underwriters

Markets

One platform. Four distinct markets.

Each region has its own regulators, distribution models and data rules. We scope every pilot against the requirements that matter in your market.

UK

United Kingdom

Carriers, Lloyd’s and London Market, MGAs under delegated authority.

We scope against

  • PRA SS1/23 model risk
  • FCA Consumer Duty
  • UK GDPR
US

United States

Carriers, MGAs and program business across commercial and specialty lines.

We scope against

  • NAIC AI model bulletin
  • State rate and form filings
  • State privacy laws
ME

Middle East

GCC carriers, takaful operators and regional reinsurers.

We scope against

  • Local data residency
  • CBUAE and Saudi IA expectations
  • Bilingual documentation
AS

Asia

Carriers, MGAs and reinsurers across APAC hubs including Singapore and Hong Kong.

We scope against

  • MAS FEAT principles
  • PDPA and local privacy rules
  • Outsourcing and cloud guidelines

Listed topics are reviewed with your compliance and technology teams during scoping; they are not statements of regulatory approval.

The problem

Insurance still runs on manual work and stale reports.

01

Manual underwriting

Underwriting relies on manual review, incomplete data, and subjective judgment. A single commercial policy can take days, and inaccurate risk pricing erodes combined ratios.

02

Fragmented operations

Policy administration, reinsurance, and compliance sit in disconnected systems, creating data silos, audit gaps, and slow customer service.

03

Executive blind spots

Boards and C-suites receive static reports days after events occur. Strategic decisions are made on stale, incomplete intelligence they cannot interrogate.

The platform

From risk decision to boardroom.

Start with a focused use case. Use RiskEngine on its own or within InsurEdge, and connect your chosen products across the insurance value chain.

Example: submission to underwriter review

Illustrative flow; exact stages depend on your products and workflow.

  1. 01 Submission received

    Bring together an application and its supporting documents.

  2. 02 Details extracted

    Prepare submission information for review and risk assessment.

  3. 03 Risk assessed

    RiskEngine provides an explainable risk and pricing recommendation.

  4. 04 Underwriter reviews

    The underwriter reviews the recommendation and decides next steps.

RiskEnginePart of the InsurEdge workbench; also available separately

A more consistent view of every risk.

Insurance-focused machine learning for risk assessment and pricing, with the reasoning behind every recommendation.

For Underwriting teams, pricing and actuarial leads

~5 minPer file (about 303 seconds), internal measurement

Request a RiskEngine demo
RiskEngine · Product demo Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Automated risk scoringScore submissions consistently using insurance-specific models and your underwriting guidelines.
  • Pricing recommendationsData-backed pricing guidance that underwriters can review, adjust, and approve.
  • Explainable decisionsEvery score comes with a human-readable explanation for underwriter oversight and regulatory review.
  • Anomaly and fraud signalsFlag unusual submissions early with real-time anomaly detection.

InsurEdgeUnderwriting workspace

Underwriting workflows in one workspace.

Submission intake, underwriting and policy workflows in one place, working alongside your existing core systems.

For Underwriting operations, policy administration, compliance

4 to 5 minPer file, internal measurement

Request an InsurEdge demo
InsurEdge · Product demo Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Document ingestionExtract and validate data from submissions and supporting documents automatically.
  • Policy workflow supportSupport for issuance, endorsements, renewals and cancellations, scoped around your existing administration system.
  • Customer 360 onboardingDigital KYC, document validation, risk profiling, and agent and broker portals.
  • Configurable workflow controlsConfigure workflow rules and capture audit information around your operating requirements.

ExecBriefExecutive intelligence

Board-ready intelligence, live.

Executive views, forecasts and AI briefings that sit alongside your existing BI and finance reporting.

For Boards, C-suites, finance and strategy teams

Pilot KPIBoard-pack preparation time against your current cycle

Request an ExecBrief demo
ExecBrief · Product demo Watch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)
  • Role-based dashboardsKPI views tailored to each executive's priorities across every business unit.
  • Automated board reportsGenerate board-ready presentations and regulatory reports directly from live data.
  • Predictive forecastingProject revenue, loss ratios, and growth with scenario analysis and confidence intervals.
  • Interactive drill-downsInterrogate any metric down to the transaction level without waiting for an analyst.

Measurable value

Every claim measured against your baseline.

Processing time, accuracy and cost are measured during the pilot against your current process, using agreed definitions rather than vendor estimates. Each pilot closes with a scorecard your finance, underwriting and risk owners can sign off.

~303 sRiskEngine processing time per file
4 to 5 minInsurEdge processing time per file
InternalMeasured on Hyperion's own runs; times vary with file size, complexity and integrations

Scroll to view the full table

Metrics measured by each Hyperion product and the P&L line they affect
ProductWhat we measureHow it is measuredP&L line
RiskEngineTime to quoteSubmission received to priced recommendation, per casePremium growth, expense ratio
Risk-model accuracyDiscrimination (Gini/AUC) and calibration on hold-out and live business; underwriter override rateLoss ratio
Fraud and anomaly precisionShare of flagged cases confirmed on review; missed cases found laterLoss ratio
InsurEdgeProcessing time per submissionIntake to underwriting-ready, from workflow timestampsExpense ratio
Extraction accuracyField-level accuracy versus underwriter-validated valuesExpense ratio, data quality
Straight-through and rework rateCases needing no manual touch; cases returned for missing or incorrect dataExpense ratio, capacity
ExecBriefReporting cycle timeHours to produce a board or management pack, before and afterExpense ratio
Forecast accuracyForecast error (MAPE) against actuals for premium and loss ratioPlanning, capital allocation

Processing times are Hyperion internal measurements. Accuracy, cost and P&L figures come only from pilots measured against your baseline.

LR

Loss ratio

More consistent risk selection, pricing adequacy by segment and earlier fraud signals reduce claims cost per pound, dollar or dirham of premium written.

ER

Expense ratio

Less manual keying, rework and report assembly lowers acquisition and administration cost per policy.

GWP

Premium growth

Faster, more consistent quotes improve broker responsiveness and let the same underwriting team handle more submissions.

GOV

Capital and governance

Explainable decisions, audit trails and timely forecasts support model-risk oversight, regulatory review and earlier capital decisions.

Operational gains

  • Faster submission-to-quote
  • Lower handling cost per policy
  • More capacity, same team
  • Fewer data errors and rework
  • Earlier fraud signals

Strategic advantage

  • Consistent decisions across teams
  • Explainable decisions for regulators
  • Faster broker responses
  • Underwriters focused on judgement
  • One view of performance for the board

Compounding value

  • Models improve as outcomes accumulate
  • New lines reuse the same platform
  • Data becomes a pricing asset
  • Governance ready before scrutiny
  • Gains compound across renewals

Estimate the P&L impact for your book

Enter your own figures and assumptions. This is illustrative, not a forecast or guarantee; released-hour value represents capacity, not guaranteed cash savings.

Claims cost impact (assumption)
-
Value of released hours
-
Underwriter hours released
-
Illustrative annual impact
-
Send me this estimate with a walkthrough

Claims impact = annual GWP × assumed loss-ratio improvement (points ÷ 100). Released-hour value = annual submissions × minutes × assumed reduction (%) ÷ 100 ÷ 60 × hourly cost. It is not a guaranteed cash saving; excludes implementation fees, premium growth and capital effects.

How we work

Pilot first. Prove value. Then scale.

Start with one workflow. Agree the baseline, success measures, data handling and decision owners before any pilot begins.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Select a workflow, such as submission triage, risk scoring or board reporting. Document the current process and agree measurable acceptance criteria.

  2. 02

    Pilot

    Confirm jurisdiction, data access, integration boundaries and review controls. Then evaluate the scoped use case with your team.

  3. 03

    Scale

    Review results against the agreed criteria. Decide whether to stop, refine the use case or plan a wider deployment.

Security & governance

Governance starts with your use case.

Every deployment is reviewed against your product, jurisdiction and operating model, with your risk, compliance and technology teams involved from day one.

Model oversight

Agree how recommendations are reviewed, challenged and documented by your underwriting and governance teams.

Data handling

Review data categories, access, retention, transfer and hosting requirements before sharing operational or policyholder data.

Integration boundaries

Document which core, policy, CRM and reporting systems are in scope, and which remain systems of record.

Market requirements

Map relevant local obligations and control evidence with your compliance, legal and technology teams for the intended deployment.

Request the security & governance pack

Architecture and data-flow overview, hosting and data-handling options, model documentation approach and the current control evidence available for your review.

Request the pack

FAQ

Questions enterprise teams ask us.

Can't find what you need? Talk to us.

Does InsurEdge replace our core policy system?

Not by default. InsurEdge supports intake, underwriting and policy workflows. Systems, responsibilities and integration boundaries are agreed during discovery; a core-system replacement is not assumed.

How does a pilot work?

We scope one workflow, document the current process and agree measurable acceptance criteria. Jurisdiction, data handling, system access and review controls are confirmed before evaluation. Any decision to expand is based on results against the agreed criteria.

Which markets do you support?

Hyperion.ai is focused on insurance teams in the UK, US, Middle East and Asia. We scope jurisdiction, local workflows, hosting and control requirements with each organisation; deployment suitability is confirmed for the specific use case.

Can we start with one product or module?

Yes. RiskEngine is part of the InsurEdge workbench and can also be evaluated on its own as a standalone module. You can start with one product or module against a focused use case. Connections to other products and systems are scoped around your requirements.

Where is customer data hosted?

Hosting and data-residency requirements depend on the deployment and jurisdiction. We confirm available options and review the requirements with your team before a pilot; contact us for current deployment details.

Can underwriters review AI recommendations?

RiskEngine is designed to provide explainable risk and pricing recommendations for underwriter review. The appropriate human review, controls and audit requirements are scoped for the intended use.

Does ExecBrief replace our BI tools?

ExecBrief is positioned to complement existing reporting and BI: it focuses on executive views, forecasts and briefings. Data sources and integration boundaries are agreed during discovery.

What security certifications do you hold?

We don’t publish certification claims on this website. Request our security & governance pack for the current control evidence, hosting options and data-handling details available for your evaluation.

Company

Seema, Founder and CEO of Hyperion.ai

World-class AI, built for insurance.

Hyperion.ai combines insurance domain expertise with machine learning to support insurers operating in the UK, US, Middle East and Asia. The operating entity is Sumyati Astro Tech LLP.

Seema Founder & CEO
LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)

We welcome conversations with insurance teams.

Contact

Discuss your insurance workflows.

Tell us what interests you, from product demos and pilots to security details or a P&L walkthrough. We’ll follow up to discuss your requirements.

What happens next

  1. 1
    Share your interest

    Choose what you would like to explore and add any questions.

  2. 2
    Discuss your requirements

    We’ll review your market, workflows and priorities with you.

  3. 3
    Agree on next steps

    Plan a demo, scope a pilot or discuss the materials you requested.

Send an enquiry

Please do not include policyholder or other confidential information.

Your details are used to respond to your enquiry. Privacy Policy.